My response to Life Wave patches and all other such snake oil remedy. The Earth is now inundated in millions of pulsed electromagnetic frequencies. There are NO affordable shielding solutions available, period. Public disregard of *tens of thousands* of studies detailing direct biological damage in relation to electromagnetic exposure, is obvious. It's not just humans being maimed and murdered. >>> https://www.wildlifeandwireless.org/
1) On what basis do you claim the LifeWave patches to be snake oil remedy? 2) What is your understanding of electromagnetic radiation? 3) What, in your understanding, is the Mechanism of Action of the LifeWave patches? 4) What is the relationship between the electromagnetic radiation to which you refer and the LifeWave patches?
I will begin by answering question #2. I studied radio broadcast for three years during high school years (1966-1969) and built my first tube style radio receiver before graduation. After graduating from high school, I became interested in audio amplification and sound acoustics. This included wave propagation theory and sound wave frequency dissipation via modulations in closed auditorium settings. I worked free lance in several respected sound recording studios during the late 1970's and early 1980's. I began designing, building, and modifying audio amplifiers for professional recording studio use in the early 1990's.
It was during this time I became aware of potential electromagnetic harms to human health. This was detailed in a 1977 study released by the Russian Academy of Sciences. Since those early days, I've read somewhere in the neighborhood of 150,000 pages of peer reviewed studies detailing electromagnetic influences on biological cells. I could refer to these studies for many, many pages.
The propagation(s) of modulated square waves and pulsed frequency (multiple bandwidth) broadcast are next to impossible to block. Some of these wave forms are in the 4 to 14 cycle range. You would need a continuous shield of Mu-metal or similar product to block these low frequency wavelengths. High frequency square waves directly modulate DNA stranding in biological cells. I could go on and on. Perhaps start with these pedestrian level descriptions of
You have not answered questions 1, 3 and 4. Your answer to question 2 does not specifically explain what electromagnetic radiation is, so is also not an answer to the question. Can you explain the electromagnetic spectrum and the difference between electromagnetic waves and sound waves without reference to any source by answering these questions right now i.e. without looking at any website, book or other publication?
Other than diffraction effects, there are few differences in propagation patterns between acoustic and electromagnetic broadcast. The electromagnetic spectrum covers frequencies from near zero to well above the range of human hearing. Sound waves (in air) travel at the speed of sound, electromagnetic waves (in vacuum) travel at the speed of light. There are ionizing and non-ionizing spectrum's attributable to electromagnetic propagation.
I have no interest in debating the issues. You know damn well the subjects of electromagnetic poisoning effects have been well researched and documented for over 50 years...
You are misperceiving the situation. The issue is not about the toxic effects of electromagnetic radiation on biological systems, The issue is about your claim that the LifeWave patches are snake oil remedy. You have provided no evidence for your claim which of course has impacted negatively on your credibility.
My response to Life Wave patches and all other such snake oil remedy. The Earth is now inundated in millions of pulsed electromagnetic frequencies. There are NO affordable shielding solutions available, period. Public disregard of *tens of thousands* of studies detailing direct biological damage in relation to electromagnetic exposure, is obvious. It's not just humans being maimed and murdered. >>> https://www.wildlifeandwireless.org/
1) On what basis do you claim the LifeWave patches to be snake oil remedy? 2) What is your understanding of electromagnetic radiation? 3) What, in your understanding, is the Mechanism of Action of the LifeWave patches? 4) What is the relationship between the electromagnetic radiation to which you refer and the LifeWave patches?
I will begin by answering question #2. I studied radio broadcast for three years during high school years (1966-1969) and built my first tube style radio receiver before graduation. After graduating from high school, I became interested in audio amplification and sound acoustics. This included wave propagation theory and sound wave frequency dissipation via modulations in closed auditorium settings. I worked free lance in several respected sound recording studios during the late 1970's and early 1980's. I began designing, building, and modifying audio amplifiers for professional recording studio use in the early 1990's.
It was during this time I became aware of potential electromagnetic harms to human health. This was detailed in a 1977 study released by the Russian Academy of Sciences. Since those early days, I've read somewhere in the neighborhood of 150,000 pages of peer reviewed studies detailing electromagnetic influences on biological cells. I could refer to these studies for many, many pages.
The propagation(s) of modulated square waves and pulsed frequency (multiple bandwidth) broadcast are next to impossible to block. Some of these wave forms are in the 4 to 14 cycle range. You would need a continuous shield of Mu-metal or similar product to block these low frequency wavelengths. High frequency square waves directly modulate DNA stranding in biological cells. I could go on and on. Perhaps start with these pedestrian level descriptions of
electromagnetic/biological hazards. >>> https://magdahavas.com/
You have not answered questions 1, 3 and 4. Your answer to question 2 does not specifically explain what electromagnetic radiation is, so is also not an answer to the question. Can you explain the electromagnetic spectrum and the difference between electromagnetic waves and sound waves without reference to any source by answering these questions right now i.e. without looking at any website, book or other publication?
Other than diffraction effects, there are few differences in propagation patterns between acoustic and electromagnetic broadcast. The electromagnetic spectrum covers frequencies from near zero to well above the range of human hearing. Sound waves (in air) travel at the speed of sound, electromagnetic waves (in vacuum) travel at the speed of light. There are ionizing and non-ionizing spectrum's attributable to electromagnetic propagation.
I have no interest in debating the issues. You know damn well the subjects of electromagnetic poisoning effects have been well researched and documented for over 50 years...
You are misperceiving the situation. The issue is not about the toxic effects of electromagnetic radiation on biological systems, The issue is about your claim that the LifeWave patches are snake oil remedy. You have provided no evidence for your claim which of course has impacted negatively on your credibility.