This looks a jolly good read, Frances! And, so far, such a perfect approach to the structure of the article (to the point that my initial reaction was "I'm glad I didn't write anything on the truth of Covid, this would have trounced it.") I haven't got time to read it all right now but I have downloaded all the documents in what looks like a treasure trove. They can populate the Covid 19 folder of my (now quite extensive) Conspiracy Files. You may yet drag me onto the 5G stage. I'm not actually against it - and I am aware of the blood and circulatory damage it does - just that I don't see the additional deaths above the murder and fakery, yet! Incidentally, I found out yesterday that, as well as putting the elderly on Midazolam pathways (obvious murder which, oddly, very few nurses/carers have expressed ANY qualms about), they also had a policy of denying antibiotics (Azithromycin) if CV +ve, so they died of pneumonia in pretty short order. The shame the medical profession should be feeling, but quite obviously isn't... None of them have ANY problem murdering ANYONE. Presumably relatives are on the list too, if the price is high enough. What utter bastards!!
All hospitals have 5G antennae on the roof and wifi at every bed. If I get sick or have another stroke I won't be calling any ambulances, which are also 5G locked and loaded. I have told my son that whatever happens we must deal with it at home. I won't go into the Death Wards.
If you keep up the cross posting of great reports, I will have to spend all my time online in my email. Thanks for cross posting this. I am sharing and popping it into my saved items.
This one has validated everything I have written on the subject since 2016. I am absolutely delighted to see that a doctor has reached the same conclusion as me about the deadly electro-magnetic radiation being the root cause of C19!
Absolutely the best compilation article relating EMF effects and Covid symptoms. I've been attempting to awaken people to these associations for nearly three years. Zero feedback on most web sites, as the public is in deep denial of health conditions related to electromagnetic pollution. Thank you for making my day. Good on ya!
Many thanks for your kind words Paul. Much appreciated 🙏 Only a pleasure. Yes there is massive denial about electromagnetic pollution. Tragic situation.
Umm, I'm rather skeptical. I have 5G WiFi in my house. The symptoms such as loss-of-smell during the incident were not unique to influenza, were they? Shouldn't I have fell down with those symptoms with such radiation? Plus can't you do statistical cross-analyses with people who work with power lines, transmission lines, radio antennae changes and see their rates of cancer, etc?
Wouldn't the dose / intensity make the response-curve? Just like small amounts of gamma radiation over a cumulative time period is less damaging than high amounts. If anything, my family members started getting sick after taking the vaccine. I never took any. Plus didn't Asian countries have 5G technology way before...?
All the cancers and autisms and whatnot are correlated with a higher vaccine uptake in vaccine schedule uptake for children, as well as consumption of manufactured seed oils. These make much more sense to me than electromagnetic radiation, given there's over 30-40 years of microwave usage and whatnot but I don't doubt small dosages have chronic effects over long time periods depending on the frequency-response.
I believe that your hypothesis doesn't "hold water". COVID was not a pandemic, because its mortality rate didn't warrant that characterization. But it is caused by a highly contageous pathogen. EMFs do not behave at all like pathogens. EMF exposure produces symptoms, temporally related and depending somewhat on the affected individuals' particular sensitivity. But those symptoms are not "contageous" from person to person consistent with its incubation period after exposure.
I contracted COVID in the summer of 2020 and it had nothing to do with EMF exposure since I live in a very low EMF rural area. It did behave exactly as one would expect from a respiratory virus, albeit worse than any flu. It IS a gain-of-function enhanced bioweapon, so being unusually severe is no surprise. However, it responded well to Ivermectin and other antiviral strategies, and I was up and about on the fifth day. Spread of COVID in my tiny community also followed very typical viral behavior, and, again, had nothing to do with 5G or any other intense radiation exposure.
The entire scenario decisively contradicts your thesis.
Yes covid was not a pandemic. It was a plandemic. A scamdemic. A deception. Please provide valid scientific evidence for the following claims you make:
1. That the 'highly contagious' pathogen exists i.e. it was properly isolated, purified and sequenced.
2. That this claimed pathogen causes a condition called Covid-19.
3. That this claimed pathogen is contagious.
4. That this claimed pathogen is a gain-of-function bioweapon.
I am aware of this body of 'evidence.' It is you who made these claims so it is you who must provide the evidence for these claims. The body of evidence to which you refer has been shown to be invalid.
There's another theory. There are intentional releases of alternate clone viruses but not the one that was computer-modelled. The asymptotic spread was just a cover-up to take the injection. One of the women in charge with the pandemic response, before she was paid off used to be a part of some studies of some rare-infectious agents for certain animal-borne diseases and she talked about the governments releasing it on populations, since there were no proximal animals with such agents. The co-morbidities swapping shenanigans and withdrawal of medical care for the elderly while administrating them midazolam while denying them anti-biotics for the usual secondary infection following influenza which correlates with the decline of flu theory (no reported cases) and exactly same pyramidal distribution of deaths across all age ranges with no statistically significant % of death.
They said "SARS-CoV-2" didn't behave like a pathogen (arguing that this respiratory "virus" was really a vascular one) although these "pathogens" have never been proven to exist. You can point to a wide variety of environmental factors that seem to cause "viral" disease.
I think she's a completely unreformed believer. I don't know whether to feel sorry for her or to put her in a museum. Almost no one still holds that Covid was real and necessary. Interestingly, some Gallup or whatever poll in the US said that 70% of people intended to take up the booster presently being offered there. The actual figures for takeup are, hilariously, just 2%. So, not only is Gallup obviously not employing anyone to enquire what people's intentions are, but only 2% of people are actually stupid enough to still believe the narrative - and we've just been talking to one! We didn't get much out of her but I like that she thinks there's an authority she can go to to get this pesky little question of "the truth" out of the way, and have us condemned for wrongthink. I doubt she's going to see the irony. LOL. xx
In what way? I'm genuinely interested, in case you've seen something that I've missed. In what I've read so far he lays it all out (rather neatly) on the table for us to make up our own minds. And if there's one thing we don't seem to have here it's chaos. Is your position that the government is telling us the truth and did its best to save us from a deadly pandemic that's more dangerous than anything in Harry Potter? Or do you question the story in some other way?
Cross posted! I see that we have a lot in common!
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/all-my-substack-articles-on-emfc19
Many thanks Frances. Much appreciated! Yes I see we do 😊
This looks a jolly good read, Frances! And, so far, such a perfect approach to the structure of the article (to the point that my initial reaction was "I'm glad I didn't write anything on the truth of Covid, this would have trounced it.") I haven't got time to read it all right now but I have downloaded all the documents in what looks like a treasure trove. They can populate the Covid 19 folder of my (now quite extensive) Conspiracy Files. You may yet drag me onto the 5G stage. I'm not actually against it - and I am aware of the blood and circulatory damage it does - just that I don't see the additional deaths above the murder and fakery, yet! Incidentally, I found out yesterday that, as well as putting the elderly on Midazolam pathways (obvious murder which, oddly, very few nurses/carers have expressed ANY qualms about), they also had a policy of denying antibiotics (Azithromycin) if CV +ve, so they died of pneumonia in pretty short order. The shame the medical profession should be feeling, but quite obviously isn't... None of them have ANY problem murdering ANYONE. Presumably relatives are on the list too, if the price is high enough. What utter bastards!!
All hospitals have 5G antennae on the roof and wifi at every bed. If I get sick or have another stroke I won't be calling any ambulances, which are also 5G locked and loaded. I have told my son that whatever happens we must deal with it at home. I won't go into the Death Wards.
If you keep up the cross posting of great reports, I will have to spend all my time online in my email. Thanks for cross posting this. I am sharing and popping it into my saved items.
This one has validated everything I have written on the subject since 2016. I am absolutely delighted to see that a doctor has reached the same conclusion as me about the deadly electro-magnetic radiation being the root cause of C19!
Absolutely the best compilation article relating EMF effects and Covid symptoms. I've been attempting to awaken people to these associations for nearly three years. Zero feedback on most web sites, as the public is in deep denial of health conditions related to electromagnetic pollution. Thank you for making my day. Good on ya!
Many thanks for your kind words Paul. Much appreciated 🙏 Only a pleasure. Yes there is massive denial about electromagnetic pollution. Tragic situation.
Umm, I'm rather skeptical. I have 5G WiFi in my house. The symptoms such as loss-of-smell during the incident were not unique to influenza, were they? Shouldn't I have fell down with those symptoms with such radiation? Plus can't you do statistical cross-analyses with people who work with power lines, transmission lines, radio antennae changes and see their rates of cancer, etc?
Wouldn't the dose / intensity make the response-curve? Just like small amounts of gamma radiation over a cumulative time period is less damaging than high amounts. If anything, my family members started getting sick after taking the vaccine. I never took any. Plus didn't Asian countries have 5G technology way before...?
All the cancers and autisms and whatnot are correlated with a higher vaccine uptake in vaccine schedule uptake for children, as well as consumption of manufactured seed oils. These make much more sense to me than electromagnetic radiation, given there's over 30-40 years of microwave usage and whatnot but I don't doubt small dosages have chronic effects over long time periods depending on the frequency-response.
Hi!
I attempted to purchase your book, Paper Gods, but was unable to locate it on Amazon.
Where to purchase it?
Thank you!
Lise from Maine (former licensed clinician)
I can't believe I just found you. I've been looking at the COVID-5G-transhumanism link for a couple years now and you covered it all right here.
Thank you R!CKYRANTS. Much appreciate your kind comment 🙏
I believe that your hypothesis doesn't "hold water". COVID was not a pandemic, because its mortality rate didn't warrant that characterization. But it is caused by a highly contageous pathogen. EMFs do not behave at all like pathogens. EMF exposure produces symptoms, temporally related and depending somewhat on the affected individuals' particular sensitivity. But those symptoms are not "contageous" from person to person consistent with its incubation period after exposure.
I contracted COVID in the summer of 2020 and it had nothing to do with EMF exposure since I live in a very low EMF rural area. It did behave exactly as one would expect from a respiratory virus, albeit worse than any flu. It IS a gain-of-function enhanced bioweapon, so being unusually severe is no surprise. However, it responded well to Ivermectin and other antiviral strategies, and I was up and about on the fifth day. Spread of COVID in my tiny community also followed very typical viral behavior, and, again, had nothing to do with 5G or any other intense radiation exposure.
The entire scenario decisively contradicts your thesis.
Yes covid was not a pandemic. It was a plandemic. A scamdemic. A deception. Please provide valid scientific evidence for the following claims you make:
1. That the 'highly contagious' pathogen exists i.e. it was properly isolated, purified and sequenced.
2. That this claimed pathogen causes a condition called Covid-19.
3. That this claimed pathogen is contagious.
4. That this claimed pathogen is a gain-of-function bioweapon.
There is a very large body of evidence covering all these points. Where have you been?
I am aware of this body of 'evidence.' It is you who made these claims so it is you who must provide the evidence for these claims. The body of evidence to which you refer has been shown to be invalid.
There's another theory. There are intentional releases of alternate clone viruses but not the one that was computer-modelled. The asymptotic spread was just a cover-up to take the injection. One of the women in charge with the pandemic response, before she was paid off used to be a part of some studies of some rare-infectious agents for certain animal-borne diseases and she talked about the governments releasing it on populations, since there were no proximal animals with such agents. The co-morbidities swapping shenanigans and withdrawal of medical care for the elderly while administrating them midazolam while denying them anti-biotics for the usual secondary infection following influenza which correlates with the decline of flu theory (no reported cases) and exactly same pyramidal distribution of deaths across all age ranges with no statistically significant % of death.
They said "SARS-CoV-2" didn't behave like a pathogen (arguing that this respiratory "virus" was really a vascular one) although these "pathogens" have never been proven to exist. You can point to a wide variety of environmental factors that seem to cause "viral" disease.
You are most welcome and thanks for your kind feedback and the link. Appreciated.
You've made a claim now you must provide your evidence, failing which your credibility will be negatively impacted upon.
I wasn't sure if Lorraine was actually being sarcastic. Lol I guess not!
Shills are not welcome. You are now reported for making unfounded accusations and having zero braincells.
I think she's a completely unreformed believer. I don't know whether to feel sorry for her or to put her in a museum. Almost no one still holds that Covid was real and necessary. Interestingly, some Gallup or whatever poll in the US said that 70% of people intended to take up the booster presently being offered there. The actual figures for takeup are, hilariously, just 2%. So, not only is Gallup obviously not employing anyone to enquire what people's intentions are, but only 2% of people are actually stupid enough to still believe the narrative - and we've just been talking to one! We didn't get much out of her but I like that she thinks there's an authority she can go to to get this pesky little question of "the truth" out of the way, and have us condemned for wrongthink. I doubt she's going to see the irony. LOL. xx
In what way? I'm genuinely interested, in case you've seen something that I've missed. In what I've read so far he lays it all out (rather neatly) on the table for us to make up our own minds. And if there's one thing we don't seem to have here it's chaos. Is your position that the government is telling us the truth and did its best to save us from a deadly pandemic that's more dangerous than anything in Harry Potter? Or do you question the story in some other way?